Skip to Main Content

insightsarticles

Medicare Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Prospective Payment System (PPS) Final Rule

08.09.23

October 4, 2023, Update

On October 4, 2023, CMS issued updates to the FY 2024 SNF PPS Final Rule due to errors that appeared in the calculations originally issued in the August 7, 2023, Federal Register. These corrections are effective as if they had been included in the FY 2024 SNF PPS Final Rule which is effective October 1, 2023.

As a result of these corrections, we have updated our interactive PPS rate calculator accordingly.

The updated, pre-reclassified, pre-rural floor hospital inpatient PPS (IPPS) wage data is used in developing the wage index to be applied to SNFs. A technical error was included in the calculation of the IPPS Final Rule, as a result the use of corrected wage data required recalculation of wage indexes as well as the:

  • Wage index budget neutrality factor,
  • Unadjusted SNF PPS Federal per diem rates provided in Tables 3 and 4 of the August 7th issued Federal Register,
  • Case-mix adjusted SNF PPS rates provided in Tables 5 and 6 of the August 7th issued Federal Register, and
  • The impact analysis provided in Table 30 of the August 7th issued Federal Register.
  • There were also changes made to the FY 2024 Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM) ICD-10 Mappings. CMS has republished an updated code mappings accordingly on the CMS website.

______________________________________________________________________________

August 9, 2023

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Final Rule for the PPS for SNFs for FY 2024, which was published in the Federal Register on August 7, 2023. The regulations in this rule are effective October 1, 2023, except for certain amendments that are effective January 1, 2024. 

The rule: 

  • Updates the PPS payment rates for SNFs for FY 2024 using the market basket update and budget neutrality factors effective October 1, 2023, as well as changes the labor-related portion of rates. 
  • Implements the second phase of the Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM) parity adjustment recalibration. 
  • Updates the consolidated billing provision. 
  • Addresses changes to civil monetary penalties.
  • Updates the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10) mappings used under PDPM. 
  • Updates the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program (SNF QRP).
  • Updates the Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing Program (SNF VBP). 

2024 PPS rate calculations 

The Final Rule provides a productivity-adjusted market basket increase for SNFs of 6.4% beginning October 1, 2023, which reflects: 

  • A market basket increase of 3% based on IHS Global Inc.’s (IGI’s) second quarter 2023 forecast with historical data through the first quarter of 2023.
  • An added 3.6% associated with a forecast error adjustment.
  • A reduction of 0.2% in accordance with the multifactor productivity adjustment.

CMS estimates that the aggregate impact of the payment policies in this Final Rule would result in an increase of 4%, or approximately $1.4 billion, in Medicare Part A payments to SNFs in FY 2024. This estimate reflects a $2.2 billion increase as a result of the 6.4% market basket update, as well as a negative 2.3%, or approximately $789 million decrease, resulting from the second phase of the PDPM parity adjustment recalibration. The PDPM parity adjustment recalibration was implemented in the FY 2023 Final Rule to balance mitigating the financial impact on providers of recalibrating the PDPM parity adjustment with ensuring accurate Medicare Part A SNF payments due to the unintended increase in payments of approximately 5%, or $1.7 billion annually with the implementation of PDPM, which was intended to be budget neutral. The adjustment factor is 4.6% with a two-year phase-in period.  

The projected overall impact to providers in urban and rural areas is an average increase of 4.1% and 3.3%, respectively, with a low of 1.6% for urban outlying providers and a high of 5.3% for urban Middle Atlantic providers―actual impact will vary.  

A labor-related share, based on the relative importance of labor-related cost categories (that is, those cost categories that are labor-intensive and vary with the local labor market) in the input price index, was calculated based on IGI’s second quarter 2023 forecast, with historical data through the first quarter of 2023. The final labor-related share applied as a result is 71.1%. 

The applicable wage index continues to be based on the inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) hospital wage data, unadjusted for occupational mix, rural floor, or outmigration adjustment (from FY 2020) as the basis for the SNF PPS wage index in the absence of SNF specific data. 

Changes in PDPM ICD-10 Code Mappings 

The PDPM utilizes the ICD-10 codes in several ways, including using the person’s primary diagnosis to assign patients to clinical categories under several PDPM components. This year CMS finalized changes to the clinical category assignment for five new ICD-10 codes that were effective October 1, 2022, and made changes to the PDPM ICD-10 code mappings for several other codes. 

Consolidated billing

The Final Rule added marriage and family therapists and mental health counselors to the list of practitioners whose services are excluded from the consolidated billing provision, effective January 1, 2024.

Civil monetary penalties

CMS eliminated the requirements for facilities to waive their right to a hearing in writing in order to receive the 35% penalty reduction. In its place, CMS created a constructive waiver process that is automatic when no timely request for a hearing is received by CMS. 

SNF QRP update 

The SNF QRP applies to freestanding SNFs, SNFs affiliated with acute care facilities, and all non-critical access hospital (CAH) swing-bed rural hospitals. It requires the annual market basket percentage increase applicable to a SNF to be reduced by 2% for a fiscal year if the SNF does not submit required data.   

The Final Rule adds two new measures, modifies one measure, and removes three measures from the SNF QRP.

The following measures are being implemented by CMS for this program: 

  • The Discharge Function (DC Function) Score measure beginning with the FY 2025 SNF QRP. This assessment-based outcome measure evaluates functional status by calculating the percentage of SNF residents who meet or exceed an expected discharge function score.  
  • The COVID-19 Vaccine: Percent of Patients/Residents Who Are Up to Date measure beginning with the FY 2026 SNF QRP. This process measure reports the percentage of stays in which residents in a SNF are up to date on their COVID-19 vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC’s) most recent guidance.  

The following measures are being modified: 

  • The COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage among Healthcare Personnel (HCP) measure beginning with the FY 2025 SNF QRP.  

The following measures are being removed: 

  • Application of Percent of Long-Term Care Hospital Patients with an Admission and Discharge Functional Assessment and a Care Plan That Addresses Function. 
  • Application of the IRF Functional Outcome Measures: Change in Self-Care Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients (Change in Self-Care Score) measure. 
  • Application of the IRF Functional Outcome Measures: Change in Mobility Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients (Change in Mobility Score) measure. 

Additional changes to the SNF QRP are as follows: 

  • SNFs must report 100% of the required quality measures data and standardized resident assessment data collected using the MDS on at least 90% of all assessments submitted beginning with FY 2026.  
  • The public reporting of the following measures will begin as follows: 

October 2024

  • DC Function measure

October 2025

  • Patient/Resident COVID-19 Vaccine measure. 
  • Transfer of Health (TOH) Information to the Provider—Post-Acute Care (PAC) Measure and the TOH Information to the Patient—PAC Measure.  

SNF VBP Program update 

The SNF VBP Program awards incentive payments to SNFs to encourage improvements in the quality of care provided, and applies to freestanding SNFs, SNFs affiliated with acute care facilities, and all non-CAH swing bed rural hospitals.   

In this Final Rule, CMS is adopting four new quality measures as follows: 

  • The Nursing Staff Turnover measure beginning with the FY 2026 program year. This is a structural measure that uses auditable electronic data reported to CMS’ Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system to calculate annual turnover rates for nursing staff, including registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and nurse aids. This is currently being measured and publicly reported on Care Compare.  
  • The Percent of Residents Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury (Long Stay) beginning with the FY 2027 program year. This measure is an outcome measure that estimates the percentage of long-stay residents who have experienced one or more falls with major injury. 
  • The Discharge Function Score measure beginning with the FY 2027 program year. This measure is also an outcome measure and estimates the percentage of SNF residents who meet or exceed an expected discharge score during the reporting period. 
  • The Number of Hospitalizations per 1,000 Long-Stay Resident Days measure beginning with the FY 2027 program year. This measure calculates the number of unplanned inpatient admissions to an acute care hospital, critical access hospital, or outpatient observation stays that occurred among long-stay residents per 1,000 long-stay resident days using one year of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims data. 

CMS is also changing the SNF 30-Day Potentially Preventable Readmission measure (SNFPPR) (renamed the SNF Potentially Preventable Readmissions after Hospital Discharge) by changing the outcome observation window from a fixed 30-day window following acute care hospital discharge to within the SNF stay, and changing the length of time allowed between a qualified prior proximal inpatient discharge and SNF readmission from one day to 30 days. This measure is also being renamed to the SNF Within-Stay Potentially Preventable Readmission (SNF WS PPR) Measure and is replacing the SNF 30-Day All-Cause Readmission Measure (SNFRM) beginning with the FY 2028 program year. 

Lastly, a Health Equity Adjustment (HEA) is being adopted to not only appropriately measure performance by rewarding SNFs that overcome the challenges of caring for higher proportions of SNF residents with dual eligibility status (DES), but also to incentivize those who have not achieved such high-quality care to work toward improvement. A SNF’s performance will need to meet or exceed a certain threshold and its resident population during the applicable performance period for the program year will have to include at least 20% of residents with DES. This adjustment will begin with the FY 2027 program year. In addition, to support the HEA, CMS is increasing the payback percentage policy under the SNF VBP program from the current 60% to a level such that the bonuses provided to the high-performing, high-DES-serving SNFs do not come at the expense of the other SNFs.  

Calculate your facility's FY 2024 rates with our interactive SNF PPS calculator

Our experts at BerryDunn have created an interactive rate calculator to assist you with the calculation of your PPS rates for FY 2024. The calculator is now in a new web-based platform, which can be accessed now. 

Access the calculator

If you have any specific questions about the Final Rule or how it might impact your facility, please contact Ashley Tkowski or Melissa Baez

Related Professionals

Principals

BerryDunn experts and consultants

2019 SNF PPS Final Rule: Rates and so much more

CMS has issued the final rule for the Prospective Payment System (PPS) and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) for FY 2019 (scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2018). The rule:

  • Updates the PPS payment rates for SNFs for FY 2019 effective October 1, 2018.
  • Finalizes the payment system called the Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) to replace the current Resource Utilization Groups, Version IV (RUG-IV) model beginning on October 1, 2019.
  • Finalizes revisions to the regulation text that describes a beneficiary’s SNF “resident” status under the consolidated billing provision and the required content of the SNF level of care certification.
  • Finalizes several operational aspects of the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP), which implements a 2% reduction to the SNF market basket percentage for that fiscal year to SNFs that do not satisfy reporting requirements.
  • Finalizes changes to the SNF Value Based Purchasing Program (VBP), which implements a 2% withhold to SNF Part A payments that can be earned back, based on a SNFs rehospitalization rate and level of improvement, as follows:
    • The 2% reductions and the SNF specific value-based incentive payment adjustment to SNF claims will occur simultaneously,
    • Continuation of the achievement and benchmark threshold rates as previously finalized in the FY 2018 SNF PPS final rule for FY 2020 and finalized the numerical values for FY 2021 based on the FY 2017 baseline period,
    • Adopted FY 2019 as the performance period for the FY 2021 SNF VBP program year and FY 2017 hospital discharges as the baseline period for the FY 2021 SNF VBP program year, 
    • Beginning with the FY 2022 program year and for subsequent program years adoption of a performance period and baseline period that is the 1-year period following the performance and baseline period for the previous program year,
    • SNFs with insufficient baseline period data will be scored based only on their achievement during the performance period, 
    • Low-volume SNFs, with less than 25 eligible stays during a performance period for a program year, will be assigned a performance score based on the average of all SNF performance scores, 
    • SNFs with observed readmission rates of zero may receive risk-standardized readmission rates that are greater than zero, and 
    • Adopted an Extraordinary Circumstances Exceptions policy that will exclude from the calculation of  the measure rate for the applicable baseline and performance periods the calendar months during which the SNF was affected by the extraordinary circumstance.

FY 2019 PPS rate calculations - CORRECTION

CMS issued a correction notice to the 2019 SNF PPS Final Rule on October 3, 2018.

The Interactive Rate Calculator incorporates provider-specific Value Based Purchasing (VBP) adjustments. Enter your facility’s provider number, to calculate your provider-specific VBP adjusted rates. 

Our senior living experts have calculated the FY 2019 SNF Medicare PPS rates based on the final rule for urban and rural areas of Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont. CMS projects that aggregate payments in FY 2019 to SNFs will increase $820 million, a 2.4% increase as required by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. Absent this statutory requirement, the FY 2019 market basket update factor would have been 2%, a market basket index of 2.8% reduced by the multifactor productivity adjustment of 0.8%.

In addition to the estimated increase in Medicare payments to SNF’s of $820 million, CMS projects the overall impact of the SNF VBP as a reduction of $211 million in aggregate payments to SNFs during FY 2019, for an estimated net increase of $609 million.

The projected overall impact to providers in urban and rural areas is an average increase of 2.4% and 2.5%, respectively, in estimated payments compared with FY 2018. Providers in rural New England will experience an estimated increase in payments of approximately 1.6% while urban New England providers will experience an estimated increase in payments of 1.7% – actual impact will vary depending on the provider’s CBSA.

The updated rates reflect:

  • A 2.4% net market basket increase for FY 2019—the maximum market basket update allowed as a result of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 which establishes a special rule for FY 2019 that requires the market basket percentage, after the application of the productivity adjustment, to be 2.4%.
  • A decrease in the labor-related weight from 70.8% for FY 2018 to 70.5% for FY 2019.

The applicable wage index continues to be based on the hospital wage data (from FY 2015) in the absence of SNF specific data.

BerryDunn has provided an interactive rate calculator to assist with the calculation of applicable rates and projected Medicare revenues for FY 2019. To access the interactive rate calculator click here.

Please note errors have been identified in the case-mix adjusted rates of the final rule; we believe our interactive rate calculator has corrected these errors; however, if CMS proposes any corrections to these rates, BerryDunn will update the interactive rate calculator as necessary.

Patient-Driven Payment Model

The final rule establishes a new classification system, the Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM), which ties SNF payments to patient conditions and care needs rather than volume of services provided to replace the current RUG-IV model. The new classification system is an updated version of the 2017 Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Resident Classification System Version 1 (RCS-1).

The implementation date for the final system is October 1, 2019 (FY 2020). The PDPM would completely replace RUGs for Medicare Part A Fee-For-Service payment to SNFs. Payment will be based on patient characteristics associated with care components. CMS finalized several core PDPM elements:

  • Payments will be the sum of five independently-determined, case-mix adjusted payment components plus a non-case-mix component (CMG).
  • Therapy minutes are no longer relevant in determining payment, rather patients are assigned to a CMG for each component using clinical information which differs by component.
  • A variable payment schedule was finalized in which payments will taper for physical therapy, occupational therapy and nontherapy ancillary services and will begin on different days for each component.
  • Elimination of multiple mandatory SNF PPS Assessments. PDPM requires only an admission and a discharge assessment and would permit an optional interim payment assessment which is intended to allow SNFs to reclassify patients into CMGs based on changes in condition.
  • Requirement to use ICD-10 diagnosis codes on the admission MDS and as part of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and nontherapy ancillary services classification into a CMG. ICD-10 coding on claims will now drive payment by assigning a diagnosis at admission and a CMG.
  • Combined limit on group and concurrent therapy of up to 25% of a resident’s treatment time per discipline per stay.

If you have any specific questions about the final rule or how it might impact your facility, please contact Tammy Brunetti or Kevin Ware.

Article
Final rule for FY 2019 SNF PPS and consolidated billing

Read this if your CFO has recently departed, or if you're looking for a replacement.

With the post-Covid labor shortage, “the Great Resignation,” an aging workforce, and ongoing staffing concerns, almost every industry is facing challenges in hiring talented staff. To address these challenges, many organizations are hiring temporary or interim help—even for C-suite positions such as Chief Financial Officers (CFOs).

You may be thinking, “The CFO is a key business partner in advising and collaborating with the CEO and developing a long-term strategy for the organization; why would I hire a contractor to fill this most-important role?” Hiring an interim CFO may be a good option to consider in certain circumstances. Here are three situations where temporary help might be the best solution for your organization.

Your organization has grown

If your company has grown since you created your finance department, or your controller isn’t ready or suited for a promotion, bringing on an interim CFO can be a natural next step in your company’s evolution, without having to make a long-term commitment. It can allow you to take the time and fully understand what you need from the role — and what kind of person is the best fit for your company’s future.

BerryDunn's Kathy Parker, leader of the Boston-based Outsourced Accounting group, has worked with many companies to help them through periods of transition. "As companies grow, many need team members at various skill levels, which requires more money to pay for multiple full-time roles," she shared. "Obtaining interim CFO services allows a company to access different skill levels while paying a fraction of the cost. As the company grows, they can always scale its resources; the beauty of this model is the flexibility."

If your company is looking for greater financial skill or advice to expand into a new market, or turn around an underperforming division, you may want to bring on an outsourced CFO with a specific set of objectives and timeline in mind. You can bring someone on board to develop growth strategies, make course corrections, bring in new financing, and update operational processes, without necessarily needing to keep those skills in the organization once they finish their assignment. Your company benefits from this very specific skill set without the expense of having a talented but expensive resource on your permanent payroll.

Your CFO has resigned

The best-laid succession plans often go astray. If that’s the case when your CFO departs, your organization may need to outsource the CFO function to fill the gap. When your company loses the leader of company-wide financial functions, you may need to find someone who can come in with those skills and get right to work. While they may need guidance and support on specifics to your company, they should be able to adapt quickly and keep financial operations running smoothly. Articulating short-term goals and setting deadlines for naming a new CFO can help lay the foundation for a successful engagement.

You don’t have the budget for a full-time CFO

If your company is the right size to have a part-time CFO, outsourcing CFO functions can be less expensive than bringing on a full-time in-house CFO. Depending on your operational and financial rhythms, you may need the CFO role full-time in parts of the year, and not in others. Initially, an interim CFO can bring a new perspective from a professional who is coming in with fresh eyes and experience outside of your company.

After the immediate need or initial crisis passes, you can review your options. Once the temporary CFO’s agreement expires, you can bring someone new in depending on your needs, or keep the contract CFO in place by extending their assignment.

Considerations for hiring an interim CFO

Making the decision between hiring someone full-time or bringing in temporary contract help can be difficult. Although it oversimplifies the decision a bit, a good rule of thumb is: the more strategic the role will be, the more important it is that you have a long-term person in the job. CFOs can have a wide range of duties, including, but not limited to:

  • Financial risk management, including planning and record-keeping
  • Management of compliance and regulatory requirements
  • Creating and monitoring reliable control systems
  • Debt and equity financing
  • Financial reporting to the Board of Directors

If the focus is primarily overseeing the financial functions of the organization and/or developing a skilled finance department, you can rely — at least initially — on a CFO for hire.

Regardless of what you choose to do, your decision will have an impact on the financial health of your organization — from avoiding finance department dissatisfaction or turnover to capitalizing on new market opportunities. Getting outside advice or a more objective view may be an important part of making the right choice for your company.

BerryDunn can help whether you need extra assistance in your office during peak times or interim leadership support during periods of transition. We offer the expertise of a fully staffed accounting department for short-term assignments or long-term engagements―so you can focus on your business. Meet our interim assistance experts.

Article
Three reasons to consider hiring an interim CFO

Read this if your company is considering outsourced information technology services.

For management, it’s the perennial question: Keep things in-house or outsource?

For management, it’s the perennial question: Keep things in-house or outsource? Most companies or organizations have outsourcing opportunities, from revenue cycle to payment processing to IT security. When deciding whether to outsource, you weigh the trade-offs and benefits by considering variables such as cost, internal expertise, cross coverage, and organizational risk.

In IT services, outsourcing may win out as technology becomes more complex. Maintaining expertise and depth for all the IT components in an environment can be resource-intensive.

Outsourced solutions allow IT teams to shift some of their focus from maintaining infrastructure to getting more value out of existing systems, increasing data analytics, and better linking technology to business objectives. The same can be applied to revenue cycle outsourcing, shifting the focus from getting clean bills out and cash coming in, to looking at the financial health of the organization, analyzing service lines, patient experience, or advancing projects.  

Once you’ve decided, there’s another question you need to ask
Lost sometimes in the discussion of whether to use outsourced services is how. Even after you’ve done your due diligence and chosen a great vendor, you need to stay involved. It can be easy to think, “Vendor XYZ is monitoring our servers or our days in AR, so we should be all set. I can stop worrying at night about our system reliability or our cash flow.” Not true.

You may be outsourcing a component of your technology environment or collections, but you are not outsourcing the accountability for it—from an internal administrative standpoint or (in many cases) from a legal standpoint.

Beware of a false state of confidence
No matter how clear the expectations and rules of engagement with your vendor at the onset of a partnership, circumstances can change—regulatory updates, technology advancements, and old-fashioned vendor neglect. In hiring the vendor, you are accountable for oversight of the partnership. Be actively engaged in the ongoing execution of the services. Also, periodically revisit the contract, make sure the vendor is following all terms, and confirm (with an outside audit, when appropriate) that you are getting the services you need.

Take, for example, server monitoring, which applies to every organization or company, large or small, with data on a server. When a managed service vendor wants to contract with you to provide monitoring services, the vendor’s salesperson will likely assure you that you need not worry about the stability of your server infrastructure, that the monitoring will catch issues before they occur, and that any issues that do arise will be resolved before the end user is impacted. Ideally, this is true, but you need to confirm.

Here’s how to stay involved with your vendor
Ask lots of questions. There’s never a question too small. Here are samples of how precisely you should drill down:

  • What metrics will be monitored, specifically?
  • Why do the metrics being monitored matter to our own business objectives?
  • What thresholds must be met to notify us or produce an alert?
  • What does exceeding a threshold mean to our business?
  • Who on our team will be notified if an alert is warranted?
  • What corrective action will be taken?

Ask uncomfortable questions
Being willing to ask challenging questions of your vendors, even when you are not an expert, is critical. You may feel uncomfortable but asking vendors to explain something to you in terms you understand is very reasonable. They’re the experts; you’re not expected to already understand every detail or you wouldn’t have needed to hire them. It’s their job to explain it to you. Without asking these questions, you may end up with a fairly generic solution that does produce a service or monitor something, but not necessarily all the things you need.

Ask obvious questions
You don’t want anything to slip by simply because you or the vendor took it for granted. It is common to assume that more is being done by a vendor than actually is. By asking even obvious questions, you can avoid this trap. All too often we conduct an IT assessment and are told that a vendor is providing a service, only to discover that the tasks are not happening as expected.

You are accountable for your whole team—in-house and outsourced members
An outsourced solution is an extension of your team. Taking an active and engaged role in an outsourcing partnership remains consistent with your management responsibilities. At the end of the day, management is responsible for achieving business objectives and mission. Regularly check in to make sure that the vendor stays focused on that same mission.

Article
Oxymoron of the month: Outsourced accountability

More and more emphasis is being put on cybersecurity by companies of all sizes. Whether it’s the news headlines of notable IT incidents, greater emphasis on the value of data, or the monetization of certain types of attacks, an increasing amount of energy and money is going towards security. Security has the attention of leadership and the board and it is not going away. One of the biggest risks to and vulnerabilities of any organization’s security continues to be its people. Innovative approaches and new technology can reduce risk but they still don’t prevent the damage that can be inflicted by an employee simply opening an attachment or following a link. This is more likely to happen than you may think.

Technology also doesn’t prepare a management team for how to handle the IT response, communication effort, and workforce management required during and after an event. Technology doesn’t lessen the operational impact that your organization will feel when, not if, you experience an event.

So let’s examine the human and operational side of cybersecurity. Below are three factors you should address to reduce risk and prepare your organization for an event:

  1. People: Create and maintain a vigilant workforce
    Ask yourself, “How prepared is our workforce when it comes to security threats and protecting our data? How likely would it be for one of our team members to click on a link or open an attachment that appear to be from our CFO? Would our team members look closely enough at the email address and notice that the organization name is different by one letter?”
     

    According to the 2016 Verizon Data Breach Report, 30% of phishing messages were opened by the target across all campaigns and 12% went on to click on the attachment or link.

    Phishing email attacks directed at your company through your team range from very obvious to extremely believable. Some attempts are sent widely and are looking for just one person to click, while others are extremely targeted and deliberate. In either case, it is vital that each employee takes enough time to realize that the email request is unusual. Perhaps there are strange typos in the request or it is odd the CFO is emailing while on vacation. That moment your employees take to pause and decide whether to click on the link/attachment could mean the difference between experiencing an event or not.

    So how do you create and cultivate this type of thought process in your workforce? Lots of education and awareness efforts. This goes beyond just an annual in-service training on HIPAA. It may include education sessions, emails with tips and tricks, posters describing the risk, and also exercises to test your workforce against phishing and security exploits. It also takes leadership embracing security as a strategic imperative and leading the organization to take it seriously. Once you have these efforts in place, you can create culture change to build and maintain an environment where an employee is not embarrassed to check with the CFO’s office to see if they really did send an email from Bora Bora.
  1. Plan: Implement a disaster recovery and incident response plan 
    Through the years, disaster recovery plans have been the usual response. Mostly, the emphasis has been on recovering data after a non-security IT event, often discussed in context of a fire, power loss, or hardware failure. Increasingly, cyber-attacks are creeping into the forefront of planning efforts. The challenge with cyber-events is that they are murkier to understand – and harder for leadership – to assist with.

    It’s easier to understand the concept of a fire destroying your server room and the plan entailing acquiring new equipment, recovering data from backup, restoring operations, having good downtime procedures, and communicating the restoration efforts along the way. What is much more challenging is if the event begins with a suspicion by employees, customers, or vendors who believe their data has been stolen without any conclusive information that your company is the originating point of the data loss. How do you take action if you know very little about the situation? What do you communicate if you are not sure what to say? It is this level of uncertainty that makes it so difficult. Do you have a plan in place for how to respond to an incident? Here are some questions to consider:
     
    1. How will we communicate internally with our staff about the incident?
    2. How will we communicate with our clients? Our patients? Our community?
    3. When should we call our insurance company? Our attorney?
    4. Is reception prepared to describe what is going on if someone visits our office?
    5. Do we have the technical expertise to diagnose the issue?
    6. Do we have set protocols in place for when to bring our systems off-line and are our downtime procedures ready to use?
    7. When the press gets wind of the situation, who will communicate with them and what will we share?
    8. If our telephone system and network is taken offline, how we will we communicate with our leadership team and workforce?

By starting to ask these questions, you can ascertain how ready you may, or may not be, for a cyber-attack when it comes.

  1. Practice: Prepare your team with table top exercises  
    Given the complexity and diversity of the threats people are encountering today, no single written plan can account for all of the possible combinations of cyber-attacks. A plan can give guidance, set communication protocols, and structure your approach to your response. But by conducting exercises against hypothetical situations, you can test your plan, identify weaknesses in the plan, and also provide your leadership team with insight and experience – before it counts.

    A table top exercise entails one team member (perhaps from IT or from an outside firm) coming up with a hypothetical situation and a series of facts and clues about the situation that are given to your leadership team over time. Your team then implements the existing plans to respond to the incident and make decisions. There are no right or wrong answers in this scenario. Rather, the goal is to practice the decision-making and response process to determine where improvements are needed.

    Maybe you run an exercise and realize that you have not communicated to your staff that no mention of the event should be shared by employees on social media. Maybe the exercise makes you realize that the network administrator who is on vacation at the time is the only one who knows how to log onto the firewall. You might identify specific gaps that are lacking in your cybersecurity coverage. There is much to learn that can help you prepare for the real thing.

As you know, there are many different threats and risks facing organizations. Some are from inside an organization while others come from outside. Simply throwing additional technology at the problem will not sufficiently address the risks. While your people continue to be one of the biggest threats, they can also be one of your biggest assets, in both preventing issues from occurring and then responding quickly and appropriately when they do. Remember focus on your People, Your Plan, and Your Practice.

Article
The three P's of improving your company's cybersecurity soft skills

Follow these six steps to help your senior living organization improve cash flow, decrease days in accounts receivable, and reduce write offs.

From regulatory and reimbursement rule changes to new software and staff turnover, senior living facilities deal with a variety of issues that can result in eroding margins. Monitoring days in accounts receivable and creeping increases in bad debt should be part of a regular review of your facility’s financial indicators.

Here are six steps you and your organization can take to make your review more efficient and potentially improve your bottom line:

Step 1: Understand your facility’s current payer mix.

Understanding your payer mix and various billing requirements and reimbursement schedules will help you set reasonable goals and make an accurate cash flow forecast. For example, government payers often have a two-week reimbursement turn-around for a clean claim, while commercial insurance reimbursement may take up to 90 days. Discovering what actions you can take to keep the payment process as short as possible can lessen your average days in accounts receivable and improve cash flow.

Step 2: Gain clarity on your facility’s billing calendar.

Using data from Step 1, review (or develop) your team’s billing calendar. The faster you send a complete and accurate bill, the sooner you will receive payment.

Have a candid discussion with your billers and work on removing (or at least reducing) existing or perceived barriers to producing timely and accurate bills. Facilities frequently find opportunities for cash flow optimization by communicating their expectations for vendors and care partners. For example, some facilities rely on their vendors to provide billing logs for therapy and ancillary services in order to finalize Resource Utilization Groups (RUGs) and bill Medicare and advantage plans. Delayed medical supply and pharmacy invoices frequently hold up private pay billing. Working with vendors to shorten turnaround time is critical to receiving faster payments.

Interdependencies and areas outside the billers’ control can also negatively influence revenue cycle and contribute to payment delays. Nursing and therapy department schedules, documentation, and the clinical team’s understanding of the principles of reimbursement all play significant roles in timeliness and accuracy of Minimum Data Sets (MDSs) — a key component of Medicare and Medicaid billing. Review these interdependencies for internal holdups and shorten time to get claims produced.

Step 3: Review billing practices.

Observe your staff and monitor the billing logs and insurance claim acceptance reports to locate and review rejected invoices. Since rejected claims are not accepted into the insurer’s system, they will never be reflected as denied on remittance advice documents. Review of submitted claims for rejections is also important as frequently billing software marks claims as billed after a claim is generated. Instruct billers to review rejections immediately after submitting the bill, so rework, resubmission, and payment are timely.

Encourage your billers to generate pull communications (using available reporting tools on insurance portals) to review claim status and resolve any unpaid or suspended claims. This is usually a quicker process than waiting for a push communication (remittance advice) to identify unpaid claims.

Step 4: Review how your facility receives payments.

Challenge any delays in depositing money. Many insurance companies offer payment via ACH transfer. Discuss remote check deposit solutions with your financial institution to eliminate delays. If the facility acts as a representative payee for residents, make sure social security checks are directly deposited to the appropriate account. If you use a separate non-operating account to receive residents’ pensions, consider same day bill pay transfer to the operating account.

Step 5: Review industry benchmarks.

This is critical to understanding where your facility stands and seeing where you can make improvements. BerryDunn’s database of SNF Medicare cost reports filed for FY 2015 - 2018 shows:

Skilled Nursing Facilities: Days in Accounts Receivable

Step 6: Celebrate successes!

Clearly some facilities are doing it very well, while some need to take corrective action. This information can also help you set reasonable goals overall (see Step 1) as well as payer-specific reimbursement goals that make sense for your facility. Review them with the revenue cycle team and question any significant variances; challenge staff to both identify reasons for variances and propose remedial action. Helping your staff see the big picture and understanding how they play a role in achieving department and company goals are critical to sustaining lasting change AND constant improvement.

Change, even if it brings intrinsic rewards (like decreased days in accounts receivable, increased margin to facilitate growth), can be difficult. Acknowledge that changing processes can be tough and people may have to do things differently or learn new skills to meet the facility’s goal. By celebrating the improvements — even little ones — like putting new processes in place, you encourage and engage people to take ownership of the process. Celebrating the wins helps create advocates and lets your team know you appreciate their work. 

To learn more, contact one of our revenue cycle specialists.

Article
Six steps to gain speed on collections