Read this if you work with the chargemaster or have revenue-generating oversight at your hospital or organization.
In general, very few people get excited about maintaining their chargemaster, aka the charge description master, or CDM. There are some people who are exceptions to the rule, however, and these people (who hold a special place in my heart) are all too familiar with the supply charge conundrum of what is or what is not separately chargeable.
Routine supplies are not separately billable and are items included in the general cost of the room or procedure. The industry is aligned on classifying certain items, such as gowns and gloves, as routine supplies. However, there are 10-fold or more items that providers and payors lack agreement on as to how they should be classified, which can be challenging to reconcile.
Almost every commercial payor policy states that they will not pay for routine supplies. These policies continue to evolve in the direction of excluding more and more items as separately chargeable. If excluded supply items make it through claim processes, payor auditors will undoubtedly be looking to take back these payments. Percent of charge contracts are the most significant risk for takebacks, but these charges may also impact outlier and other payments.
A good example of this is oxygen, an item that many hospitals historically have and continue to charge separately. Medicare’s policies allow this charge. Conversely, an increasing number of commercial plans specifically state that oxygen is not separately chargeable. For hospitals that charge/charged oxygen, the annual charges are/were significant. If the hospital has/had a percent of charge contracts, the actual net charge tied to oxygen is meaningful. This creates a difficult challenge where the charges can't just be stopped and shifted to room and board or other procedures.
Best practices to optimize your chargemaster
Hospitals should not look at a supply or group of supplies myopically. First, the hospital needs policies and procedures that determine what is or is not a routine supply and what is included in the room and board rate. These foundational policies are often missing or out-of-date with the realities of modern healthcare. The next step is to update or develop pricing policies and procedures that support the supply and room rate policy. Pricing policies are essential for pricing transparency, commercial payor contracting, and defending charges during an audit.
Changing pricing (and associated policies) requires planning and in-depth modeling. Price changes can and will have implications for contracted payors, regulatory requirements, pricing transparency, contractual models, and the bottom line.
Major changes should be part of a hospital’s annual price change plan. Pricing changes are all too often viewed as an annual exercise and treated as such. This is not a best practice. Hospitals should have a multi-year pricing strategy that incorporates managed care contracting strategies, market planning, and other factors. The need to change supply charge policies should be part of this plan. Very few hospitals can or should adopt a major supply policy change in one year. The financial implications and contract constraints do not allow the math to work, as moving all these charges to other procedures would cause a loss of net revenue or create charges that do not align with competitors or the industry.
The path to a defensible pricing strategy that protects revenue generated from supplies that may or may not be incidental requires an in-depth charge master analysis coupled with advanced modeling. There are costs associated with these processes (internal time and/or consultant support). However, the increased cost associated with a reactive approach to supply policies and pricing is a much bigger financial risk.
BerryDunn’s team of reimbursement, chargemaster, and defensible pricing consultants are available to answer questions and to provide assistance.