Read this if you are an organization that was operating during the pandemic.
By now, most of you have encountered advertisements from third-party vendors who are promoting their Employee Retention Credit (ERC) service. These advertisements often come with the promise of significant credits if you kept employees on payroll during the pandemic and complete a short survey. The impact of these advertisements is twofold; first, it misleads businesses and organizations into incorrectly claiming the credit, and second, it deters other organizations, who are eligible for the credit, from applying for the credit because it seems too good to be true.
The ERC is a valuable credit for organizations that meet the eligibility requirements
The fact is—for businesses and organizations that are truly eligible—the ERC can provide a substantial amount of money designed to offset some of the hardships experienced as a result of the pandemic, which is echoed by the comment from acting IRS Commissioner Doug O’Donnell who said, “While this is a legitimate credit that provides a financial lifeline to millions of businesses, there continue to be promoters who aggressively mislead people and businesses into thinking they can claim these credits.”
At BerryDunn, we are in the unique position of seeing the situation from both sides—the consulting side and the auditing side. We have partnered with many consulting clients to help them gather and evaluate the documentation needed to determine eligibility, calculate their credit, and prepare the forms necessary to claim the credit. For these clients, the ERC has provided meaningful cash to offset the impact the pandemic had on operations.
On the other hand, we have had many conversations with employers who do not appear to meet the eligibility requirements but continue to receive constant marketing materials from third-party vendors. In addition, our audit team has been in the unfortunate position of having difficult discussions with businesses and organizations who have used a third-party vendor who took aggressive and misleading positions to claim the ERC.
These are some of the red flags we have seen when auditing the ERC for businesses and organizations who have used one of these third-party vendors:
Exorbitant fees charged by ERC third-parties
Since the ERC is often viewed as “found money,” businesses and organizations have been willing to pay exorbitant fees that can range from 10% to 15% (or more) of the calculated credit, which could end up being $1M or more in some cases. Most reputable firms will charge a flat fee based on hours worked or number of employees or a fee based on the credit received, not expected, and will refund businesses for any monies that are taken back due to audit. These types of arrangements will likely end up charging lower fees than those arrangements charging a percentage of the calculated credit, whether claimed or not.
Reliance on Federal Orders to prove ERC eligibility
CDC and OSHA guidelines by themselves issued during the pandemic generally do not constitute a valid government order for the purposes of the ERC. However, most third-party vendors are relying on these federal guidelines to determine eligibility. It does not appear these guidelines will be viewed favorably under an IRS audit or a financial statement audit. As a result, allowances/reserves may be required for financial statements purposes and the IRS may disallow the credit.
Complete reliance on an ERC third-party vendor
Management is responsible for filing the necessary forms with the IRS to claim the credit, not the third-party vendor. Therefore, management should understand the basics of the credit and how it could apply to their business or organization before signing a contract.
Lack of documentation in determining ERC eligibility
Determining eligibility for the ERC can be complicated, especially if you are relying on government orders. This full or partial shutdown analysis involves analyzing various state orders and how they impacted your operations and/or gross receipts. Your financial statement auditors, as well as the IRS, will want to see detailed documentation to support your eligibility for the ERC, not simply a listing of every state or local order issued during the pandemic with no clear correlation of how they impacted your operations. If the third-party vendor is determining your ERC eligibility and calculating your credit based on a small amount of financial information or documentation from you, chances are, it will not stand up under an audit.
The bottom line: Do your due diligence and be aware of overly aggressive third-party vendors, because you may end up paying an exorbitant fee for the service, and your ERC claim may not stand up to an IRS audit, leaving you in a position to return the credit to the IRS while still owing the full agreed upon fee to the third-party vendor.
Choosing a reputable third-party ERC vendor
The good news, though, is that there are many reputable vendors out there, who will be good partners to you in determining eligibility for the ERC and ensuring that your claim will stand up to an audit. As with any third party, you will need to do some due diligence. Some simple questions to ask are:
- How long has the company been in business?
- Do they have a good reputation?
- Do they offer other services?
- What is their stance on the ERC credit: aggressive or conservative?
- Do they charge a flat fee or a percentage?
- If your credit were to be audited in three to five years, will the vendor still be around to provide audit support?
If you believe your company or organization is eligible to claim the ERC, it is in your best interest to hire a reputable firm to guide your business or organization through the process. Our experts would welcome the opportunity to consult with you, whether you are just beginning the process, or have hit some bumps in the road. Contact our team.
Read these other articles for more ERC education.
Too good to be true? IRS warns employers of ERC scams
Employee benefit plan updates: The Employee Retention Credit and student loan repayment programs